Improved access to housing for neediest people
New preferences to change how SHA structures waiting list
SEATTLE—November 20, 2002—The Seattle Housing Authority will
host a public hearing on Thursday, November 21, to hear from
community stakeholders regarding its proposed new waiting list
preferences. The housing authority plans to change the way it gives
priority to applicants waiting for public housing and Section 8
voucher assistance. The new rules will give first priority to
extremely low-income residents and maximize resources by integrating SHA more
fully into the city’s housing continuum.
The hearing will be held from 5 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. on
November 21 at
SHA's PorchLight housing center, located at 907 NW Ballard Way,
Suite 200. The new rules, or "waiting list preferences," will be
considered by SHA’s Board of Commissioners in December.
Under the proposed waiting list preferences
(table 1,
below),
first priority for housing assistance would go to all households
with income at or below 30 percent of the area median. Second
priority would go to all other applicants. Within the first priority
group, applicants referred by recognized transitional housing
programs and other service-enriched housing programs would receive
first consideration.
Under the new preferences, all public housing applicants would
continue to be screened to ensure that they would be good tenants.
In the Section 8 program, landlords are responsible for screening
prospective tenants for suitability.
History of waiting list preferences
In 1988, Congress established federal preferences requiring
housing authorities to give priority consideration to homeless,
displaced and rent-burdened households. (Rent-burdened households
pay 50 percent or more of their income for rent.)
In 1998, Congress repealed those preferences and gave housing
authorities two options for prioritizing applicants. Housing
authorities could develop their own local preference system or
continue using the government’s system of preferences. Many
housing authorities chose to create their own preferences in order
to better respond to local markets and eliminate problems created by
federal preferences.
Waiting list preferences today
Currently, SHA’s waiting list preferences are a
mix of old and new policies
(table 2,
below). At the request of
local advocates, SHA chose to retain the original federal
preferences in 1998 to ensure homeless applicants would continue
receiving first priority status. In 2002, SHA modified its
preferences so that residents of supportive housing programs and
applicants referred by the Shelter Plus Care program received first
priority status as well.
But the current system still creates difficulties
for both the housing authority and its clients, according to Kathy
Roseth. Roseth is the director of PorchLight, SHA’s applications
and Section 8 center.
"Administering the current preferences has been
extremely difficult," she said. "Too often, applicants
have to make absurd choices about their circumstances to retain
first priority on the waiting list. That makes the process
inefficient and sometimes unfair."
For example, said Roseth, under current preferences,
a family awarded first priority status due to homelessness must
remain homeless for the entire waiting period – over a year, in
many cases – to retain its priority status.
The new preferences are designed to eliminate that
sort of conundrum and allow SHA to house more people more quickly,
according to Roseth.
Because all applicants earning 30 percent of median
income or less would automatically be awarded first priority under
the new preferences, applicants would not have to prove that they
are homeless, displaced or rent burdened in order to get and retain
first priority status.
That means homeless, displaced and rent-burdened
people would continue to receive first priority, since people in
those groups almost always have incomes below 30 percent of the area
median. But because the proposed preferences focus on income only,
applicants and staff would no longer have to endure the difficult,
invasive and time-consuming task of verifying personal
circumstances.
Furthermore, by giving first consideration within
the highest priority group to applicants from transitional and
service-enriched housing programs, the new preferences would
encourage households’ movement through the continuum of affordable
housing in Seattle, from shelters through service-enriched
transitional housing to stable, permanent housing. Awarding
assistance to households that no longer need supportive environments
frees up support services for those who do.
SHA will offer no more than half of available public
housing units or Housing Choice Vouchers through referral agreements
with providers, so that at least half of SHA’s resources will
continue to be available to applicants on the general waiting list,
and applicants will not have to be associated with an agency to
receive assistance.
| |
Public Housing
|
Housing Choice vouchers
(Section 8 vouchers)
|
First Priority
|
Applicants who are:
EXPEDITED PROCESSING within this group for
applicants who are referred by qualified providers, subject to
terms of executed referral agreements. Providers include
recognized transitional housing programs and other
service-enriched housing programs. |
Applicants who are:
- Earning 30 percent of area median income or less
EXPEDITED PROCESSING within
this group for applicants who are referred by qualified
providers, subject to terms of executed referral agreements.
Providers include recognized transitional housing programs,
other service-enriched housing programs case management to
people with disabilities. |
Second Priority
|
All
others |
All
others |
Table 2 - Current Waiting List Preferences
("Modified Federal Preferences")
| |
Public Housing
|
Housing Choice vouchers
(Section 8 vouchers)
|
First Priority
|
Applicants who are:
- Homeless
- Displaced
- As of January 2002, living in a "qualified
building" (supportive housing program) or referred by
Shelter Plus Care program
|
Applicants who are:
- Homeless
- Displaced
- Living in substandard housing
- Living in overcrowded housing
- Rent burdened (paying more than 50 percent of gross
income for rent and utilities)
- As of July 2002, living in a "qualified
building" (supportive housing program) or referred by
Shelter Plus Care program
|
Second Priority
|
Applicants who are:
- Living in substandard housing
- Living in overcrowded housing
- Rent burdened (paying more than 50 percent of gross
income for rent and utilities)
|
All
others |
Third Priority
|
All
others |
Not
applicable |
|